🔗 Share this article

In my role as a game master, I traditionally steered clear of significant use of luck during my D&D sessions. I tended was for story direction and what happened in a game to be guided by character actions rather than the roll of a die. That said, I opted to alter my method, and I'm very happy with the result.

The Catalyst: Seeing a Custom Mechanic

A well-known podcast showcases a DM who regularly requests "fate rolls" from the participants. This involves selecting a specific dice and defining potential outcomes based on the roll. While it's essentially no distinct from consulting a pre-generated chart, these get invented on the spot when a course of events has no clear conclusion.

I decided to try this technique at my own game, mainly because it appeared novel and presented a change from my usual habits. The results were remarkable, prompting me to reflect on the perennial tension between preparation and spontaneity in a roleplaying game.

A Powerful Story Beat

At a session, my party had survived a city-wide fight. Afterwards, a cleric character wondered if two friendly NPCs—a brother and sister—had survived. Instead of deciding myself, I let the dice decide. I asked the player to make a twenty-sided die roll. The stakes were: on a 1-4, both would perish; a middling roll, only one succumbed; a high roll, they survived.

The die came up a 4. This led to a profoundly moving scene where the party discovered the remains of their companions, still united in their final moments. The cleric held a ceremony, which was uniquely significant due to previous roleplaying. As a final touch, I improvised that the remains were strangely transformed, revealing a magical Prayer Bead. I randomized, the item's contained spell was precisely what the party lacked to solve another pressing story problem. It's impossible to script these kinds of perfect moments.

Honing DM Agility

This experience made me wonder if chance and making it up are actually the essence of D&D. Even if you are a meticulously planning DM, your skill to pivot can rust. Groups reliably excel at upending the best constructed narratives. Therefore, a effective DM has to be able to adapt swiftly and invent scenarios in the moment.

Employing on-the-spot randomization is a great way to develop these talents without going completely outside your preparation. The trick is to deploy them for low-stakes decisions that don't fundamentally change the session's primary direction. As an example, I would avoid using it to determine if the king's advisor is a traitor. However, I would consider using it to determine if the party enter a room moments before a key action occurs.

Strengthening Collaborative Storytelling

Spontaneous randomization also helps maintain tension and cultivate the impression that the game world is alive, evolving according to their choices immediately. It reduces the sense that they are merely actors in a pre-written narrative, thereby bolstering the cooperative nature of the game.

This philosophy has historically been embedded in the game's DNA. The game's roots were filled with charts, which made sense for a playstyle focused on exploration. While current D&D often focuses on story and character, leading many DMs to feel they must prep extensively, that may not be the required method.

Finding the Right Balance

There is absolutely no problem with doing your prep. However, there is also no issue with relinquishing control and allowing the dice to determine certain outcomes instead of you. Authority is a major aspect of a DM's job. We require it to facilitate play, yet we can be reluctant to cede it, even when doing so could be beneficial.

My final suggestion is this: Don't be afraid of relinquishing a bit of your plan. Embrace a little chance for smaller story elements. You might just discover that the organic story beat is infinitely more memorable than anything you would have planned on your own.