🔗 Share this article

Via an unsigned decision, the U.S. Supreme Court permitted Texas to employ a redrawn congressional map that may create up to five new GOP-friendly districts. The six-to-three decision, issued on Thursday, grants a appeal by the state to overturn a district court's ruling that had struck down the new map in November.

Court's Rationale

The lower court wrongly interjected itself into an active primary campaign, causing much confusion and disturbing the fine balance of power in elections, the supreme court said in justifying its decision.

That lower court had earlier ruled that Texas had likely grouped voters by their race – a practice known as unconstitutional racial sorting – when it enacted the new maps. It had instructed the state to use the boundaries established after the most recent national count for the forthcoming election.

Sharp Dissent

In a sharply worded dissenting opinion, Justice Elena Kagan objected to the court's decision. She stated that it disregarded the work of the district court, pointing out that its ruling was crafted by a judge selected by ex-President Donald Trump.

We are a higher court than the district court, but we are not a better one when it comes to making such a fact-based decision, Kagan stated in a dissent joined by Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson.

She continued, Today's ruling solidifies that Texas's redistricting plan, with all its boosted partisan advantage, will control next year's elections. And it means that many Texas voters, unjustly, will be sorted in electoral districts due to their race. And that result, as this court has pronounced consistently, is a breach of the U.S. Constitution.

National Map-Drawing Fight

The ruling occurs during a national contest over the redrawing of electoral maps. Texas is a key piece in pushes to reshape the U.S. House map to secure a narrow Republican majority. Ordinarily, redistricting occurs after a decennial population count. Yet the decision by Texas Republicans to initiate a brazen mid-cycle redistricting earlier this year set off a wave among other states.

Republicans in states like North Carolina and Missouri have also enacted redistricting plans that are estimated to yield a number of more conservative seats. The opposition, meanwhile, have responded with new maps in states like California and Virginia, which could offset those potential gains.

Political Reactions

The Texas attorney general praised the High Court's decision. In a comment, he said the order protected Texas's basic authority to draw a map that guarantees electoral outcomes aligned with the GOP. We are setting the precedent for restoring our country, through each electoral district and individual state, he stated.

In contrast, Democratic officials decried the outcome. It is deeply disheartening that the Court has endorsed this severely racially gerrymandered plan from Texas Republicans, said the leader of a major party campaign committee.

Another leading Democratic figure said the court had once again damaged its standing by rubber-stamping a discriminatory map. This decision from the Court's far-right bloc proves extremists are willing to rig elections. The Texas map is a discriminatory power grab targeting Black and Latino voters, he stated.